In The Papers - Saturday, April 28th

Posted by Greg Clow in news and media, on the web on April 28, 2007 at 3:24 pm

newspaper.jpgThought for the day: Do restaurant reviewers get together to compare notes, conspiring to gang up on unsuspecting restaurateurs with back-to-back reviews of their places?

Probably not, but if they did, it would help explain why Queen West hot spot Coca has suddenly been noticed by the local food scribes even though it’s already been open for a few months. Amy Pataki gave the place quite a spanking last week, but in this weekend’s National Post, Gina Mallet is kinder in her two-fer review of Coca and chef Nathan Isberg’s other resto-lounge, Czehoski. Although she does suggest that chef should stick with the small plates:

Mr. Isberg’s way with a large plate is not so pleasing. Handmade perogies stuffed with salsify and potato creme fraiche, braised cabbage and apples, chevre noir and bacon — a tasty mouthful but the dumplings are dry and need more sour cream. I can’t resist the idea of lamb schnitzel but realize I should have when I see large pieces of lamb slipping out of their batter. I guess lamb is too coarse for the schnitzel aesthetic, which requires a tight textured meat like veal beaten to a fare-thee-well, then dipped in egg and bread crumbs and fried so it blows up like a balloon. Too late, I wish I had ordered the “ubiquitous (and sublime) steak-frites.”

Also in the Post:

Over at the Globe & Mail, today’s edition is the first Saturday issue to feature their much-hyped new design, although not a lot has changed on the food coverage front. Particularly when it comes to Joanne Kates and her attitude towards the tastes of the hoi polloi who can’t afford to regularly dine at the sort of places that she reviews, as proven by the opening salvo in her review of Relish:

Ask me how I feel about that bright green relish that you put on burgers. It comes in a jar, and is kind of sweet, kind of tart, in a sickly way. Gag. Goes good with that neon yellow ballpark mustard beloved of people not yet ready for Dijon. Which makes me wonder why anyone who knows anything about food would name their restaurant Relish. The fact that Relish is at Danforth and Woodbine (not exactly a hotbed of fun food) and that it serves tapas (another one) made me not exactly excited to go there.

Call it negative journalistic bias. Call it fear of tapas. Either way, after walking into the long and narrow restaurant and smelling the patchouli perfume, I grew even more worried. Is this gonna be one of those counterculture places with high principles and low standards?

At least she actually liked the food once she was able to set aside her fear of lowbrow condiments and dirty “counterculture” types. But next time, I’d suggest that she should call ahead to see if the restaurant has any Grey Poupon.

Also in the Globe:

In the Toronto Star, Amy Pataki wonders why Karuchie isn’t busier - although after her fantastic review, as well as Steven Davey’s similarly positive write-up in this week’s Now, that won’t be the case for long:

Cornish hen ($20) is roasted to a turn. The meat is startlingly moist and simply seasoned. It drips its juices onto the accompanying barley stuffing, the al dente grains sparked with raisins, pistachios and double-smoked bacon. The dish shows restraint and polish.

“What I do isn’t completely new, but a little bit different than those before,” says [chef/owner Chris] Thorn.

Braised beef short ribs ($17) prove the point further. The ribs have more resistance than expected, closer in texture to roast beef. Red wine and cloves faintly flavour the meat. The real surprise is in the sides. Thorn subdues the bitterness of blanched rapini with slow-sweated onion, fennel and garlic. Mashing roast chestnuts into potatoes turns them brown and slightly gritty, but the payoff is in the subtle, complex, earthy flavour. Why shout, when you can whisper?

Also in the Star:

2 Responses to “In The Papers - Saturday, April 28th”

  1. paul anter Says:

    Perhaps Pataki just didn’t enjoy her experience. Undoubetedly, Mr. Isberg is a talented chef, but a ‘cheeky” menu serves more to display the chef’s cleverness than to offer a sensual dining experience to his patrons. A little spanking isn’t so bad. Coca should take the hit and look at what kind of experience it is offering it’s customers.

  2. Greg Clow Says:

    Paul - I’ve never eaten at Coca, but my few experiences at Czehoski have ranged from fantastic (an amazing brunch) to horrendous (a disastrous lunch). No-one is perfect, and as I noted in last week’s In The Papers round-up, it’s always interesting to keep track of the different opinions that our local reviewers have of the latest hot-spots.

Leave a Comment

Please keep comments on topic and civil. Polite criticism and debate is fine, but personal attacks and other abusive comments may be deleted, and the commenter may be banned from posting further comments. Basically, if you wouldn't say it to someone's face, then please don't post it here.

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word